Skip to main content

Today in My Reading History

I've looked at this information from time to time on Goodreads, but I never thought to make it into a blog post until now! It all revolves around one question: what was I reading on this date in previous years?

I'm pretty excited for this because I can do it at random times in the future and the post will be different every time! Let me know if that's something you want to see!

I'm writing this post in advance, but I know when it's going up, so these are all accurate to posting date, October 14th! (Except maybe 2018 - I doubt I'll finish these books before the post goes up, but you never know!)
On this date in 2018, I'm reading...FURYBORN by Claire Legrand and UNBROKEN ed. by Marieke Nijkamp! I'm only about a chapter into FURYBORN, which I actually only picked up now because my library loan on THE QUEEN'S RISING expired, but so far, so good! I'm taking a little bit of a break from UNBROKEN, but I really like all the stories that I've read so far, and I'm going to pick it back up soon!

On this date in 2017, I was...not reading. The semester had swamped me. I hadn't read a book for almost two weeks (and that, even though it was AMELIA BEDELIA, was for school - I gave it 4 stars). The next book I read would be another children's book, this one for fun: CAROLINE TAKES A CHANCE by Kathleen Ernst, which I also gave 4 stars. I read from that book until the end of the series in one day!

On this date in 2016, I was reading...KISS CAM by Kiara London! I got this as an ARC and read it in two days. I gave it three stars, because even though there were a bunch of cute parts, I just kept thinking to myself: "this is not a good idea, and the characters are going to regret it." That did not make for a fun reading experience. You can read my review here.

On this date in 2015, I was reading...JUST LISTEN by Sarah Dessen! At least, I'm pretty sure. Goodreads says I didn't start it until the next day, but I'm not really the most accurate when it comes to start dates. I gave it 4 stars because it was a really great book, but I was a bit underwhelmed from everything I'd heard about it. 

On this date in 2014, I was reading...CHILDREN OF THE CITY by David Nasaw! For such a small book, this sure took me a while to get through - I was reading it for almost all of October! I ended up giving it 4 stars. It was absolutely fascinating, and it introduced me to other history books that I've also really enjoyed!

On this date in 2013, I was reading...GOOD OMENS by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett! Again, I'm pretty sure - same thing with Goodreads saying I started it a day later. This is a good one! There's going to be an Amazon Prime series of it soon, which I'm really excited for, but I definitely need to reread this before seeing it! I gave this 4 stars.

On this date in 2012, I was reading...THE HOBBIT by J.R.R. Tolkien! Another one that took me quite a while to get through! I gave it 4 stars, but honestly I think that's because I didn't hate it and thought I should have liked it more than I did. I don't recall particularly enjoying my reading experience.
 
This was really fun! I'd say this is a good day in my reading history - no favorites or 5-stars, but a bunch of books I really liked! I'm really excited to do more of these posts and see what went on on other days!

What were you reading on this date last year? Tell me in the comments!

Comments

  1. What a clever post! It would be neat if GR popped these up on our feed the way FB does. This time last year I was reading Everything Must Go by Jenny Fran Davis, which I remember thinking was quirky, fun, and though provoking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That would be such a great feature! I'd never heard of Everything Must Go, but I looked it up and it sounds really neat!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ten Books I Need More People to Love

Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly feature at The Broke and Bookish. This week's theme: Top Ten Underrated/Hidden Gem Books You've Read in the Past Year or So. One of my favorite things to do is get other people to read books I love. That way, I can discuss the boo ks with them, and if I know their tastes well enough, I know I'm givin g them something that they'll love! Unfortunately, I can't do this with the entire world. And that means that there are books that I've really enjoyed t hat just aren't widely loved. Why ? I don't know. And that's why I spend so much time trying to get other people to read them. Here are ten books I've read some what recently that I think really deserve some m ore lo ve. IRON CAST by Destiny Soria: I'll never get tired of diverse books, I 'll never get tired of historical fiction, and I'll never get tired of positive female friendships. When you pu t those all together, they ma ke a book tha

Most Anticipated Reads: First Half of 2017

Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly feature at The Broke a nd the Bookish . This week's theme : most an ti cipated reads for the first half of 2017. Wow, it's been ages since I've done a most anticipated list! In case you were wondering, my excitement for upcoming books is a s high as ever. It was so hard narrowing this list down to just ten, but I think I figured out the ten books that I'm most excited for in the first half of next year! I have a good mix of sequels and standalones (but onl y one debut, so there won't b e a lo t of overlap wi th the de buts TTT in a few weeks). Here are some of the books that I just can't contain my excitement about : OUR OWN PRIVATE UNIVERSE by Robin Talley - January 31: I love Robin Talley, and this book sounds like it's going to be so good! And it's going to have so much intersectionality! And the colors on that cover are just so aesthetically pleasing. DREAMLAND BURNING by Jennifer Latham - February

In Which I Consider My Ideal Post Length

I seem to be constantly going back and forth between having too many post ideas and not having enough. The thing is, though, that when I don't have a lot of ideas, it usually just means that I don't think I have enough to say about anything to actually make a post. Which poses an interesting question: how long do posts need to be? In particular, I'm thinking about discussion posts. I have a lot of bookish things I want to discuss, and discussion posts seem like one of the best ways to share my thoughts. But sometimes, my thoughts aren't fully-formed, or aren't that complex. I usually shy away from writing about those ideas because I don't think I have enough material to justify a post. But why don't I think I have enough? I've been a little behind on wr iting posts in advance, so it seem ed like I was running into th is question more and more often. And after a while of thinking about that, I had m y little breakthrough : I'm thinking a