Skip to main content

In Which I Consider My Ideal Post Length

I seem to be constantly going back and forth between having too many post ideas and not having enough. The thing is, though, that when I don't have a lot of ideas, it usually just means that I don't think I have enough to say about anything to actually make a post. Which poses an interesting question: how long do posts need to be?

In particular, I'm thinking about discussion posts. I have a lot of bookish things I want to discuss, and discussion posts seem like one of the best ways to share my thoughts. But sometimes, my thoughts aren't fully-formed, or aren't that complex. I usually shy away from writing about those ideas because I don't think I have enough material to justify a post. But why don't I think I have enough? I've been a little behind on writing posts in advance, so it seemed like I was running into this question more and more often.

And after a while of thinking about that, I had my little breakthrough: I'm thinking about discussion posts like essays. I don't feel happy with one unless I give a nice little introduction, explore my thoughts in detail, provide good examples, and come to some sort of conclusion, which usually ends up being a pretty long post. I don't know when this started, or why I do it. Because the thing is, blog posts aren't academic essays. Obviously. I mean, they can be. If that's what you want your blog to be like, then by all means, go for it! But I've been making myself miserable over this, and if I want to keep up my blog, I need to stop thinking like that.

So think of this as my incredibly belated New Year's Resolution. I'm going to write more discussions, because I'm not going to pressure myself to write as much about each topic. And who knows? If I don't feel like I have to write super-long posts, maybe I'll be able to work my way up to three posts a week! (Eventually. I'll try for a couple of occasional bonus posts first.)
Do you try to make your posts a certain length? Have you ever had to break yourself of any blogging habits that didn't work for you? Tell me in the comments!

Comments

  1. You could always combine a couple different thoughts into one post, too.

    I agree, though. Posts don't need to be novels themselves. You got to make the blog work for you, not the other way around! I had to stop blogging so frequently because it was taking over my life and it was super stressful.

    I'm looking forward to reading your discussion posts!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a good idea! I have a few related ideas that could go really well together in one post. And I totally agree about making your blog work for you. I'm trying to really focus on that this year!

      Delete
  2. I don't aim for any certain length, I just make my posts however long they need to be to say everything I need to say, but I generally end up on the longer side because having lots to say and using lots of words is just who I am lol. But there are times when I feel like I don't have enough to say, so I don't write those posts, just like what you said. It's based more on, like, a situational basis though since I don't have any specific word count or length.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm trying to make my posts be long enough to say everything they need to say, but I think the tricky part is figuring out the difference between something that's too short to really be a post and something that's just a short post. I'm still figuring that part out!

      Delete
  3. I tend to do a couple of different types of discussion post: one is long and in depths and usually has bullet points explaining my thoughts, and the others are short and a bit rambly, where I basically just throw the question out to my readers. Both seem to get the same amount of interaction, so I think you can really do any length you like with discussion posts :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a really good distinction! I like both of those ideas, and I have post ideas that fit both.

      Delete
  4. There is really no required length to a post. As long as you have something to say and get that point across who cares if you write 100 words or a 1000? I sometimes feel like with the longer posts I write I am actually spending too much time waffling and repeating myself for the sake of words rather than getting my point across well. I think people prefer to have a post that shows you've put thought into it and I think people are more likely to get bored if you've rambled one without saying much of anything for the sake of getting words in than if you write a shorter well thought out post.

    I hope you succeed in writing more discussion posts where you say what you want to say without worrying you're meeting a word count or structuring a post in the right way as there is no right way, is there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've run into the problem of repeating myself, too! I seem to always find something like that to delete when I'm revising the post.

      And yeah, there's definitely no one right way to post, just whatever's right for you! I'm really trying to broaden my idea of what's right for me, so that my discussion posts don't always follow the same format and aren't always the same length. I feel like the more freedom I give myself, the more I'll be able to say.

      Delete
  5. I think that as long as you're saying everything you want to say on a topic, any length is fine. I think I often have the opposite problem and I go on too long!

    Nicole @ Feed Your Fiction Addiction

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As long as the post isn't repetitive, I don't really think there's such a thing as a post that's too long! (Okay, maybe there is, but I haven't ever seen anyone go near that limit.)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Top Ten Books of 2016

Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly f eature at The Broke and the Bookish . This week's theme: top ten books of 2016. A little less than a year ago, I started my blog by making a post of my top 10 favorite books of 2015 . And now here we are again! I've come so far in blogging , and it 's really amazing to be creating the same kind of post as my fi rst one again - but I'l l save the nostalgia for my blogo versary post later this week. Last year, all of the books on my list were also on my all-time favorites list. I didn't quite read ten all-time favorites this year, so I added a couple of five-star but not-quite-favorite books to this post. I also didn't include any rereads on this list - I reread quite a few favorite books this year, and that wouldn't be fair to the rest! But anyway, here are my ten favorite books that I read in 2016. 10. THUD! by Terry Pratchett (Discworld #34) I don't think it would really be a list of my favorite books from a ye...

Thoughts on Required Reading

This blog post is brought to you by Pride and Prejudice and my AP Lit class. I've been thinking a lot about required reading, probably because I'm having to do so much of it. School comes with many types of required reading. Today, I won't be talking about reading excerpts from textbooks on various subjects, because I think everyone agrees that unless the subject is of particular interest, those readings are boring at best and painful at worst. Instead, I'm talking about being required to read entire works of literature (or, less often, nonfiction). During winter break this year, I was required to read Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice . I thought that this would be one of my easiest assignments ever. I LOVE that book. I read it for fun two summers ago and could barely put it down! I was expecting wonderful days curled up on the couch with a mug of hot chocolate, enjoying the chance to revisit one of my favorite novels while still being productive. Best of all...

10 Books That Will Make You Laugh

I like when books make me feel things, and I know that a lot of readers agree with me. It's why we aggressively recommend the books that have turned us into sobbing messes. However, I think as a whole, we think of feeling things while reading as feeling sad or angry or frustrated. Why don't we put a little more focus on the books that make us happy? I was very glad to see that this week's Top Ten Tuesday (a weekly feature at The Broke and the Bookish ) was top 10 books that will make you laugh. So take a break from the tearjerkers, sit back, and relax. (You'll laugh till you collapse! This is what happens to me now that Animaniacs i s on Netflix. ) 1. The Name of the Star by Maureen Johnson (Shades of London #1) - Maureen Johnson is one of the funniest YA authors I know of. I don't think I've ever read a book by her that hasn't made me laugh. This one just happens to be the one I read the most recently. I'll admit that this doesn't reall...