Skip to main content

Review: The Names They Gave Us

Title: The Names They Gave Us
Author: Emery Lord
Series: N/A
Length: 400 pages
Published by: Bloomsbury Children's
Publication date: May 16, 2017
Diversity: main character has asthma, black love interest, multiple supporting and minor characters of color, trans Jewish supporting character with an anxiety disorder, minor bisexual character
Rating:
Source: eARC via NetGalley

 
I knew I'd like this book before I even started it - it's an Emery Lord book, and I love all of her books so much. (Really, if you like contemporaries and you haven't read a book by her, what are you doing? Get on that. Also, follow her on Twitter.) What I definitely wasn't expecting was to get so attached to so many characters and to cry about five times. I LOVED it.

Let's talk about the biggest thing for me right off the bat: I tend to be really apprehensive about books that focus on faith and Christianity; a lot of the time, that's enough to get me to not read a book. I'm Jewish, and I grew up (and still live) in a pretty heavily Christian area. I've spent a lot of time surrounded by a certain type of lingering, preachy Christianity - sometimes people are being intentional, sometimes they aren't, but either way, the majority don't really care how other people might feel about it. It can get pretty uncomfortable (and I know I'm lucky that "uncomfortable" is the most severe word I can really use to describe it). Because of all that, I usually avoid books that discuss faith, because I think they'll feel the same way. But this is Emery Lord, and as I've said, I love everything she's ever written, so I couldn't not read it. As it turns out, I didn't have anything to worry about. Lucy's journey with her faith was absolutely non-preachy, and every part of it was handled so wonderfully.

This is definitely an emotional book. What makes it such a good emotional book, though, is that the sad moments are balanced out by the happy ones so that you feel so much of both. It made me cry, but it also made me laugh, and feel hopeful, and a million other things at the same time.

My favorite part of the book was probably the characters. Each and every major character gets their own time in the spotlight, and that makes you really care about all of them. They're all so complex, and so many of them get their own character development arcs, that I really felt that I was getting to know them throughout the course of the book.

Most of the things that I want to talk about are MAJOR spoilers, so I won't do so here. I'll just leave you with the fact that I literally can't think of anything bad to say about this book, and I highly recommend reading it.
Goodreads summary:
Lucy Hansson was ready for a perfect summer with her boyfriend, working at her childhood Bible camp on the lake. But when her mom’s cancer reappears, Lucy falters—in faith, in love, and in her ability to cope. When her boyfriend “pauses” their relationship and her summer job switches to a different camp—one for troubled kids—Lucy isn’t sure how much more she can handle. Attempting to accept a new normal, Lucy slowly regains footing among her vibrant, diverse coworkers, Sundays with her mom, and a crush on a fellow counselor. But when long-hidden family secrets emerge, can Lucy set aside her problems and discover what grace really means?

Comments

  1. *coughs* still haven't read an EL book *coughs* *is shame*

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. *sigh* We're DEFINITELY going to have to fix that.

      Delete
  2. I have this to read next week. I've had an ARC for far too long because I'm nervous about starting because it's EMery Lord and I know it'll be good but what about if it's not? THankfully, your review has reminded me to stop being irrational. I have seen plenty of good reviews and I'm interested to see faith approached in YA as it's not often included in books and I'm glad it's not preachy. I need to get reading.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Most Anticipated Reads: First Half of 2017

Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly feature at The Broke a nd the Bookish . This week's theme : most an ti cipated reads for the first half of 2017. Wow, it's been ages since I've done a most anticipated list! In case you were wondering, my excitement for upcoming books is a s high as ever. It was so hard narrowing this list down to just ten, but I think I figured out the ten books that I'm most excited for in the first half of next year! I have a good mix of sequels and standalones (but onl y one debut, so there won't b e a lo t of overlap wi th the de buts TTT in a few weeks). Here are some of the books that I just can't contain my excitement about : OUR OWN PRIVATE UNIVERSE by Robin Talley - January 31: I love Robin Talley, and this book sounds like it's going to be so good! And it's going to have so much intersectionality! And the colors on that cover are just so aesthetically pleasing. DREAMLAND BURNING by Jennifer Latham - February

Ten Books I Need More People to Love

Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly feature at The Broke and Bookish. This week's theme: Top Ten Underrated/Hidden Gem Books You've Read in the Past Year or So. One of my favorite things to do is get other people to read books I love. That way, I can discuss the boo ks with them, and if I know their tastes well enough, I know I'm givin g them something that they'll love! Unfortunately, I can't do this with the entire world. And that means that there are books that I've really enjoyed t hat just aren't widely loved. Why ? I don't know. And that's why I spend so much time trying to get other people to read them. Here are ten books I've read some what recently that I think really deserve some m ore lo ve. IRON CAST by Destiny Soria: I'll never get tired of diverse books, I 'll never get tired of historical fiction, and I'll never get tired of positive female friendships. When you pu t those all together, they ma ke a book tha

In Which I Consider My Ideal Post Length

I seem to be constantly going back and forth between having too many post ideas and not having enough. The thing is, though, that when I don't have a lot of ideas, it usually just means that I don't think I have enough to say about anything to actually make a post. Which poses an interesting question: how long do posts need to be? In particular, I'm thinking about discussion posts. I have a lot of bookish things I want to discuss, and discussion posts seem like one of the best ways to share my thoughts. But sometimes, my thoughts aren't fully-formed, or aren't that complex. I usually shy away from writing about those ideas because I don't think I have enough material to justify a post. But why don't I think I have enough? I've been a little behind on wr iting posts in advance, so it seem ed like I was running into th is question more and more often. And after a while of thinking about that, I had m y little breakthrough : I'm thinking a